Maintenance, Repair, and Operations (MRO) processes are crucial to the functionality and longevity of facilities of all shapes and sizes.
MRO involves a comprehensive set of activities, from routine maintenance and urgent repairs to ensuring the supply of essential operational tools and materials. Efficient MRO practices prevent costly downtime, optimize equipment life cycles, and ensure the safety of employees and assets.
A vital, though sometimes overlooked, aspect of successful MRO management is accurate existing conditions documentation. Understanding the current state of a facility enables faster decision-making, improves maintenance scheduling, and reduces operational risks.
Key Components of MRO for Facilities
MRO encompasses several interrelated activities, each contributing to the operational sustainability of a facility. These can be categorized into three primary domains:
- Maintenance
- Routine or scheduled tasks to prevent equipment failures
- Examples: Lubricating machinery, replacing air filters, conducting inspections
- Often divided into preventive and predictive maintenance strategies
- Preventive: Pre-planned intervals (e.g., monthly or annually) to replace components or perform maintenance tasks
- Predictive: Uses data analytics, sensors, and condition-monitoring to predict when equipment might fail
- Repair
- Unplanned interventions to restore equipment or systems that have failed or degraded
- Examples: Fixing a malfunctioning HVAC system, repairing electrical wiring, or patching roof leaks
- The goal is to return the equipment to operational status as quickly as possible to minimize downtime
- Operations Support
- Encompasses tasks that support the smooth operation of the facility and its assets, such as procuring spare parts, managing equipment inventories, and keeping critical systems running
- Examples: Monitoring environmental systems, stocking tools, and ensuring energy management practices are followed
MRO ensures that facilities operate efficiently, safely, and cost-effectively by reducing disruptions, enhancing asset reliability, and minimizing the need for capital reinvestments
The Challenges of Managing MRO for Facilities
Managing MRO activities across complex facilities can present several challenges. These obstacles often stem from information gaps, poor documentation, or ineffective communication between teams responsible for different maintenance and operational activities. Here are a few critical challenges organizations typically encounter:
- Inconsistent or Inaccurate Documentation
- If documentation is outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate, maintenance teams may struggle to locate key systems, identify problem areas, or determine proper repair protocols
- Example: Finding discrepancies between the floor plans and the actual layout of HVAC systems can cause delays in servicing
- Unscheduled Downtime and Emergency Repairs
- When equipment unexpectedly fails, facilities must divert resources to address the issue, often at a higher cost
- Without real-time information about the facility’s infrastructure, identifying the root cause of breakdowns becomes more complicated
- Coordination and Communication Issues
- MRO involves multiple stakeholders—facility managers, technicians, contractors, and suppliers—making coordination essential
- Poor documentation can slow down communication and make it harder to deploy the right resources efficiently
- Compliance and Safety Requirements
- Facilities must meet regulatory requirements, and unplanned maintenance can create compliance issues if not documented and tracked properly
Addressing these challenges requires accurate, real-time information about the facility, which is where existing conditions documentation plays a pivotal role
What Is Existing Conditions Documentation?
Existing conditions documentation refers to the comprehensive, up-to-date records of the physical state and layout of a facility at a given point in time. These records typically include:
- Floor plans, blueprints, and schematics
- Diagrams of electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems
- Asset inventories, including equipment models, serial numbers, and specifications
- Information about the condition of structural elements, such as walls, windows, and roofing
- Updated photos, 3D scans, or digital twins of facility interiors and exteriors
This documentation is often created using surveying techniques, photogrammetry, or laser scanning, providing highly accurate measurements and layouts. Modern facilities management systems often integrate this data with computer-aided facility management (CAFM) or building information modeling (BIM) software, giving teams a centralized platform to access and update relevant information.
How Accurate Documentation Supports MRO
- Facilitates Faster Repairs
- When equipment breaks down, having accurate schematics and system diagrams ensures that maintenance crews know exactly where to look and what tools or parts are needed
- Example: A technician troubleshooting an HVAC issue can quickly locate ductwork, control panels, or valves based on the documented layouts, speeding up repairs
- Optimizes Preventive and Predictive Maintenance
- With comprehensive documentation, facility managers can implement more efficient preventive maintenance schedules and predictive strategies
- Example: Knowing the installation dates, component specifications, and inspection histories of machinery helps predict when parts will need replacement, minimizing unplanned downtime
- Improves Communication and Collaboration
- Clear documentation ensures that all stakeholders—technicians, engineers, contractors, and managers—are aligned
- Example: Contractors can use the same floor plans and system layouts as internal teams, reducing confusion during collaborative projects and major repairs
- Reduces Operational Risks
- Accurate records help identify potential risks before they become serious problems
- Example: If an electrical panel was recently replaced, documentation ensures it is inspected or tested correctly as part of the next routine inspection, reducing fire hazards or compliance risks
- Supports Inventory and Asset Management
- Having a detailed record of all assets allows MRO teams to track equipment life cycles, identify underperforming assets, and ensure that spare parts are available when needed
- Example: A facility manager with access to real-time asset data can coordinate supply chain orders for tools or parts well before critical stock levels are depleted
- Ensures Compliance and Regulatory Preparedness
- Facilities must comply with regulations regarding fire safety, environmental standards, and building codes. Accurate documentation makes audits easier and ensures repairs or updates meet compliance standards
- Example: During an inspection, regulators may request documentation showing that a building's sprinkler system was installed and maintained correctly
How GPRS Services Support MRO of Facilities
Effective MRO practices are essential to maintaining the functionality, safety, and longevity of facilities.
However, these efforts are only as good as the information available to maintenance and operations teams. Accurate existing conditions documentation serves as a foundational tool for facilitating smooth maintenance processes, reducing repair times, improving collaboration, and minimizing operational risks. It provides maintenance teams with the insight needed to manage complex systems proactively, plan better preventive maintenance schedules, and respond swiftly to unexpected issues.
GPRS TruBuilt Existing Conditions As-Builts eliminate outdated and inaccurate as-builts and focus on real-time reality captured 2D CAD plan views that can integrate your infrastructure – above and below ground – to provide accurate existing conditions as-builts for your entire site or facility.
You’ll avoid clashes, reworks and change orders, reduce or eliminate costly mistakes, prevent damages and injuries, and eliminate communication bottlenecks and siloed workflows. And just like every GPRS drawing, map, and model, you can access, copy, download, and share your TruBuilt as-builts via SiteMap® (patent pending) to keep your project on time, on budget, and safe.
What can we help you visualize?
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the Benefits of Underground Utility Mapping?
Having an updated and accurate map of your subsurface infrastructure reduces accidents, budget overruns, change orders, and project downtime caused by dangerous and costly subsurface damage.
How does SiteMap® assist with Utility Mapping?
SiteMap® (patent pending), powered by GPRS, is the industry-leading infrastructure management program. It is a single source of truth, housing the 99.8%+ accurate utility locating, concrete scanning, video pipe inspection, leak detection, and 3D laser scanning data our Project Managers collect on your job site. And the best part is you get a complimentary SiteMap® Personal Subscription when GPRS performs a utility locate for you.
Does SiteMap® Work with my Existing GIS Platform?
SiteMap® allows for exporting of data to SHP, GeoJSON, GeoPackage, and DXF directly from any user’s account that either owns or has a job shared to their account. All these file formats can be imported and utilized by other GIS packages if manually imported by the user. More information can be found at SiteMap.com.
What is the difference between a design intent and as-built model?
DESIGN INTENT – Deliverables will be shown as a "best fit" to the point cloud working within customary standards, such as walls being modeled 90 degrees perpendicular to the floor, pipes and conduit modeled straight, floors and ceilings modeled horizontal, and steel members modeled straight. This will produce cleaner 2D drawings and will allow for easier dimensioning of the scan area. The deliverables will not exactly follow the scan data to maintain design intent standards. Most clients will want this option for their deliverables.
AS-BUILTS – Deliverables will be shown as close as possible to actual field capture. If walls are out of plumb, pipes and conduit show sag, floors and ceilings are unlevel, steel members show camber, etc., this will be reflected in the model. This will produce reality-capture deliverables, but 2D drawings may show “crooked” or out of plumb lines, floors will be sloped or contoured, steel members may show camber, twisting or impact damage. Dimensioning will not be as easy due being out of plumbness/levelness, etc. This option should be used when the exact conditions of the scan area is imperative. Clients using the data for fabrication, forensic analysis, bolt hole patterns, camber/sag/deformation analysis, and similar needs would require this option.
