Should Soil Testing Be Included in a Dig Policy?

Should Soil Testing Be Included in a Dig Policy?

Soil testing is an integral part of site preparation and project planning, especially when it comes to digging and excavation work.

Whether it’s for utility installation, construction, or environmental assessments, understanding the soil beneath the surface can mean the difference between a successful project and one that is plagued with delays, structural issues, or even legal troubles.

Despite the critical nature of soil testing, it is often overlooked in dig policies.

A hand picking up soil.
Soiltesting is an integral part of site preparation and project planning,especially when it comes to digging and excavation work.

The Role of Soil Testing in Digging Projects

A dig, or ground disturbance, policy typically outlines safety procedures, risk assessments, and compliance with regulations before excavation begins. It includes critical elements like identifying buried utilities, ensuring proper shoring, and maintaining site safety. However, soil testing is sometimes treated as an optional or secondary consideration. Given the central role soil conditions play in ensuring the stability and safety of any excavation or construction project, this could be seen as an oversight with significant consequences.

Soil testing provides crucial information about whether soil is contaminated, as well as its composition, moisture content, and load-bearing capacity. It can reveal whether the soil is prone to shifting, contains contaminants, or is at risk of liquefaction. Without these insights, projects may face significant risks such as ground subsidence, structural failure, or environmental hazards.

Why Precision in Soil Testing Is Critical

Precision in soil testing is the cornerstone of accurate site evaluation, as highlighted in this recent Dig Different article. Soil characteristics directly affect a project’s design, timeline, and cost. For instance, soil that is highly permeable may require additional drainage systems, while clay-rich soils may need stabilization to prevent shrinkage or swelling. Furthermore, the load-bearing capacity of soil determines the type and depth of foundations, which are essential for ensuring the longevity and safety of any structure.

Without soil testing, designers and engineers are essentially working in the dark. The entire project, whether it's a small utility installation or a large construction effort, can be jeopardized if the soil is not adequately understood. The cost of remediating issues that arise from poor soil conditions can far exceed the expense of the initial testing.

Key Components of Soil Testing

Soil testing isn’t a one-size-fits-all process. Different projects require different tests based on local conditions and the nature of the work. Here are some key tests that should be part of any comprehensive soil evaluation:

1. Soil Composition Analysis  

  This test identifies the types of particles that make up the soil, including sand, silt, clay, and organic material. It’s essential for determining the soil’s drainage capacity and suitability for construction.

2. Permeability Testing

  Soil permeability determines how well water can pass through the soil. For projects like septic systems, utility installations, or foundations, it’s important to know whether the soil will drain properly or retain too much water.

3. Compaction Testing

  Compaction testing measures the soil’s ability to withstand the weight of structures or equipment. Inadequate compaction can lead to settling, cracking, and even structural failure over time.

4. Moisture Content and Shrink-Swell Potential  

  Soils with high moisture content or those that swell and shrink (such as expansive clays) can cause foundations to shift and crack. Testing helps to predict and mitigate these risks.

5. Contaminant Testing

  In areas where industrial activity or pollution is a concern, soil testing for contaminants such as heavy metals, hydrocarbons, or pesticides is crucial. This ensures the safety of both the project and the surrounding environment.

Benefits of Including Soil Testing in a Dig Policy

Incorporating soil testing into a dig policy offers numerous benefits that can significantly improve project outcomes and mitigate risks. Here are the primary reasons why soil testing should be a mandatory element of any excavation policy:

1. Enhanced Safety and Risk Management

  Soil testing identifies potential hazards like unstable ground, contamination, or excess moisture, which can pose serious risks to workers and equipment. By addressing these issues in the planning phase, site managers can implement appropriate safety measures, reducing the risk of accidents or costly delays.

2. Accurate Project Design and Planning

  When engineers and designers have precise data on the soil’s properties, they can tailor the project to the conditions of the site. This results in more accurate designs, better material choices, and fewer surprises during construction. For example, a well-executed soil test may indicate the need for additional foundation supports or specialized drainage systems, which can be accounted for in the project’s initial budget and timeline.

3. Cost Savings Over the Long Term

  While soil testing adds upfront costs, it can prevent expensive issues later. For instance, discovering soil instability or contamination after construction has begun can lead to delays, redesigns, or even legal battles over non-compliance with environmental regulations. By testing the soil beforehand, these problems can be mitigated before they escalate.

4. Compliance with Regulations

  Many jurisdictions have stringent regulations regarding soil stability, contamination, and environmental impact. Failing to conduct proper soil tests can lead to non-compliance with local building codes and environmental laws, which can result in fines, project shutdowns, or costly remediation efforts.

5. Increased Longevity of Installations

  One of the most significant long-term benefits of soil testing is that it helps ensure the longevity of the installation. Whether it’s a utility line, a septic system, or a building foundation, proper soil testing ensures that the system is built to last, reducing the likelihood of future failures and maintenance costs. As the *Dig Different* article points out, precise testing protects the client’s investment by ensuring the system is designed for the specific conditions of the site.

Overcoming Resistance to Soil Testing

Despite its clear advantages, soil testing is often skipped due to cost concerns or a lack of awareness. Clients or contractors may be reluctant to invest in what they see as an unnecessary expense, especially for smaller projects. It’s essential to educate all stakeholders about the risks of foregoing soil testing and the potential for far greater expenses down the line if soil conditions aren’t properly understood.

Project managers and engineers should present soil testing as a risk management tool that benefits everyone involved. By demonstrating the connection between precise soil testing and a project’s long-term success, clients are more likely to see it as a valuable, even indispensable, component of the dig policy.

A GPRS Project Manager marking grass with a spray paint wand while holding an electromagnetic locator in the other hand.
SubsurfaceInvestigation Methodology (SIM) plays a key role in enhancing dig policies bysetting higher standards for utility mapping before excavation begins.

Let GPRS Help You With Your Dig Policy!

The GPRS team excels at preventing subsurface damage by following the Subsurface Investigation Methodology (SIM). SIM also plays a key role in enhancing dig policies by setting higher standards for utility mapping before excavation begins.

As the industry’s leading process for utility locates, concrete scanning, leak detection, and CCTV video pipe inspections, SIM requires utility locating contractors to use multiple technologies — such as ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic (EM) locating — ensuring redundancy and consistency in their subsurface investigations.

To earn SIM certification—a requirement for all GPRS field personnel—our Project Managers undergo a rigorous training program that includes at least 320 hours of field training and 80 hours of classroom instruction. They face a wide range of real-world scenarios to prepare them for any unique challenges they might encounter in the field.

SIM is not just a training framework; it defines the expectations for utility locating companies in terms of data collection methods and the quality of subsurface information gathered. This ensures that the data provided is both precise and actionable.

Thanks to our unwavering commitment to SIM, GPRS Project Managers maintain a 99.8%+ accuracy rate across the more than 500,000 utility locating and concrete scanning projects we have completed since our establishment in 2001.

At GPRS, we aim for 100% subsurface damage prevention. Our goal is to help you keep your projects on track, your budget intact, and your teams safe. That’s why we offer complimentary ground disturbance policy reviews to help you implement the procedures necessary for successful outcomes.

Request your free ground disturbance policy review today!