Does Your Project Need Design-Build or Design-Bid-Build?

Does Your Project Need Design-Build or Design-Bid-Build?

Choosing the right delivery method for a construction project is one of the most critical decisions in the planning phase.

Design-build and design-bid-build are two common methods, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Understanding the differences between these approaches and assessing your project’s unique requirements can help you make the right choice.

Explaining Design-Build vs. Design-Bid-Build

  • Design-Build: In this method, a single entity—often a firm or a team—is responsible for both designing and constructing the project. The design-build approach integrates these two phases into a seamless process, streamlining communication and reducing timelines.
  • Design-Bid-Build: This traditional method separates the design and construction phases. First, an architect or engineer creates the project design. Then, contractors bid on the construction work based on these designs, and one is selected to complete the construction phase.
People working around a computer sitting on top of construction plans.
Choosing the right delivery method for a construction project is one of the most critical decisions in the planning phase.

When to Choose Design-Build

Fast-Tracked Projects

Design-build is ideal for projects with tight deadlines. Since the design and construction phases overlap, this method significantly reduces the overall project timeline. For example, a commercial developer needing a new facility operational within months may benefit from the speed of design-build

Simplified Communication

With design-build, all responsibility lies with a single entity. This reduces potential communication breakdowns between designers and contractors. Fewer intermediaries mean easier problem-solving during construction, and reduced risk of conflicts over scope or specifications.

Collaborative Problem-Solving

Design-build encourages collaboration between architects, engineers, and contractors from the project’s inception. This fosters innovative solutions and can lead to better cost control and designs optimized for construction feasibility.

Owner Involvement Preferences

This method works well for owners who prefer a hands-off approach. The design-build team takes on much of the decision-making, allowing the owner to focus on high-level project outcomes.

When to Choose Design-Bid-Build

Well-Defined Projects

Design-bid-build is suitable for projects where the scope and requirements are clear from the outset. Detailed designs allow contractors to bid accurately, ensuring competitive pricing and reduced risk of change orders during construction.

Owners Seeking Greater Control

This method is ideal for owners who want more involvement in the design process. By selecting an independent designer, owners can:

- Customize the design to their specifications

- Ensure quality and functionality align with their vision

Regulatory or Funding Requirements

Some public or government-funded projects mandate the use of design-bid-build due to its transparency. The competitive bidding process ensures fair contractor selection, and compliance with procurement regulations.

Complex or Specialized Projects

For projects requiring highly specialized design elements, design-bid-build can provide more control over technical details. For example, infrastructure projects with stringent engineering standards may benefit from separate design and construction teams.

Factors to Consider When Deciding

Project Timeline

  • Tight Deadlines: Opt for design-build to overlap design and construction phases
  • Flexible Timelines: Design-bid-build allows more time for detailed design and competitive bidding

Budget Constraints

  • Fixed Budgets: Design-bid-build often provides better cost certainty due to competitive bidding
  • Cost Efficiency: Design-build may reduce costs by streamlining processes and minimizing delays

Risk Tolerance

  • Lower Risk Preference: Design-bid-build divides responsibilities, reducing risk for the owner
  • Integrated Risk Management: Design-build places accountability on a single entity, which may simplify risk management

Project Complexity

  • Highly Complex Projects: Design-bid-build offers detailed oversight and specialized expertise
  • Moderately Complex Projects: Design-build’s collaborative approach often meets the needs of moderately complex projects

Owner Involvement

  • Hands-On Owners: Design-bid-build allows greater participation in design and contractor selection
  • Hands-Off Owners: Design-build minimizes the need for detailed oversight

Advantages and Disadvantages

Design-Build

Advantages:

  • Faster project delivery
  • Streamlined communication
  • Collaborative problem-solving

Disadvantages:

  • Less transparency in cost breakdowns
  • Limited owner control over design details

Design-Bid-Build

Advantages:

  • Competitive bidding ensures fair pricing
  • Greater owner control over design
  • Clear separation of responsibilities

Disadvantages:

  • Longer project timelines
  • Higher risk of miscommunication between design and construction teams

GPRS provides accurate as-built site data to help design-build, and design-bid-build projects move seamlessly through the design and construction process.

Our utility locating, precision concrete scanning, pinpoint leak detection, and NASSCO-certified video pipe inspection services help you prevent subsurface damage and provide you with an accurate, complete picture of the subsurface infrastructure on your job site. And our 3D laser scanning and photogrammetry services, and SiteMap® (patent pending) infrastructure mapping software provide existing conditions documentation, and construction & facilities project management services to help you plan, design, manage, dig, and ultimately build better.

What can we help you visualize?

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the Benefits of Underground Utility Mapping?

Having an updated and accurate map of your subsurface infrastructure reduces accidents, budget overruns, change orders, and project downtime caused by dangerous and costly subsurface damage.

How does SiteMap® assist with Utility Mapping?

SiteMap®, powered by GPRS, is the industry-leading infrastructure management program. It is a single source of truth, housing the 99.8%+ accurate utility locating, concrete scanning, video pipe inspection, leak detection, and 3D laser scanning data our Project Managers collect on your job site. And the best part is you get a complimentary SiteMap® Personal Subscription when GPRS performs a utility locate for you.

Click here to learn more.

Does SiteMap® Work with my Existing GIS Platform?

SiteMap® allows for exporting of data to SHP, GeoJSON, GeoPackage, and DXF directly from any user’s account that either owns or has a job shared to their account. All these file formats can be imported and utilized by other GIS packages if manually imported by the user. More information can be found at SiteMap.com.